UKCORRUPTFAMILYCOURTS

December 4, 2012

After nearly 7 years of hell at the hands of this local authority

They are now being sued never ever give up x

EXPECT ME !

About these ads

10 Comments »

  1. The entirety of the legal and justice system is so enormous it requires those with the specialist skills to deliver it to be properly vetted and found competent to handle its constituent parts.
    When those in a position of trust fail to uphold the honourable traditions enshrined within the concept that such eminent practitioners are diligent and meticulous in their work, it not only damages the treasured principles of justice, it casts a damaging slur on the entire profession engaged in all parts of our justice system – especially if it is found that those who we presuppose do act with absolute integrity, are unwilling to act in order to uproot and discharge errant practices and conduct. Indeed, when there is deliberate illegality involved, it seems that almost the whole rank and file treat it with such a degree of disbelief that they run away and hide from the problem lest it should tarnish their own careers.
    This is not only shameful and cowardly, it points to a systemic failure which should be addressed without delay at the very highest level.

    Comment by Peter Evans — May 27, 2013 @ 11:25 am | Reply

  2. From: Leonard Lawrence Pilot 22 May 2013

    To: The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge
    Lord Chancellor Rt. Hon Chris Grayling MP
    Court of Appeal Civil Division SL03D00938
    Lord Justice Munby President of the Family Division
    Mrs. Justice Pauffley and all High Court Family Judges: SL03D00938
    Mr. Justice Peter Jackson and Mr Justice Baker Court of Protection

    The Abuse of Psychiatry in the Family Courts aided by Alastair Pitbaldo Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts and May Maughan
    Deputy Official Solicitor.

    Following a request for assistance by Leonard Lawrence to Richard Anelay QC, Deputy High Court Judge Family Division, it took
    only a few days for Richard Anelay QC to establish from Barrister Dominic Brazil, 1 Kings Bench Walk, that Leonard Lawrence
    had been a patient and subject to the Court of Protection, whilst Leonard Lawrence had been under the jurisdiction of the Official
    Solicitor and Slough County Court.

    It is not understood why the report on Leonard Lawrence in August 2009 by Admiral Sir John Brigstocke, Judicial Appointments
    and Conduct Ombudsman, did not inform the Lord Chief Justice and the Lord Chancellor; that District Judge John Fortgang,
    Slough County Court, knowing that Leonard Lawrence was a patient and subject to the Court of Protection would not allow Leonard
    Lawrence access to the Court of Protection. District Judge John Fortgang placed upon Leonard Lawrence hundreds of thousands
    of pounds in adverse costs and inferences, at the request of Barrister Dominic Brazil, whist Leonard Lawrence was a protected party
    and was incapable of legal discussion and understanding due to an acquired brain injury.

    The Honourable Mr. Justice Peter Jackson Court of Protection judge
    “Start Quote [The law is] completely inaccessible to those for whose benefit the legislation has been devised” End Quote

    —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

    The Abuse of Psychiatry in the Family Courts, the need for serial numbers to be added to Court of Protection Medical Certificates
    CP3 and the need for their tracking to prevent fraud.

    Medical certificates of mental incapacity have no serial numbers and are ready obtainable. When they are issued they cannot be
    readily tracked and their existence is sometimes denied by both the medical and legal profession, including in the Leonard Lawrence
    case by the Official Solicitors office.

    On the 15 May 2008 The Senior Master of the Senior Courts of England and Wales in the Queen’s Bench Division, Master Whitaker
    advised Leonard Lawrence in a letter that after consideration he had passed three unregistered Court of Protection Medical Certificates
    and a chronology to the Chief Judge of the Court of Protection. As of May 2013 the Court of Protection has no record of ever receiving
    these three Medical Certificates and The Senior Master’s office is unable to provide any record of sending the Medical Certificates and
    Chronology to the Court of Protection.

    Comment by Kira — May 22, 2013 @ 11:40 am | Reply

  3. 17 April 2013 Leonard Lawrence Pilot

    The Earth Needs Rebels Show

    Ministry of Justice info DVSO Website

    OPG-Public Guardian & me the carer Website

    staffordshiresocialservices.wordpress

    Google: North Bovey fire destroys Grade II-listed 17th century cottage | This …

    1. This is the former house that I rented, as you can see it burnt down!

    2. A forensic investigation of the chimney lining did not support a chimney fire

    3. The chimney sweep who had swept the chimney only a week before the fire was asked to sign a statement that it was a chimney fire, he refused.

    4. I am advise the fire occured directly above my bed in the loft space.

    5. At the time of the fire detectives were investigating what had occured to me from 2004 whilst under the jurisdiction of the Official Solicitor to the Senior
    Courts.

    6. After the fire the retired Judge appointed by the Bar Standards Board Commissioner to assist me was removed for being to helpful. This was also the case
    with the solicitor appointed by the Solicitors Regulatory Authority.

    7. Following the criminal investigation in 2009 only in 2011 did it become it became apparent that the Law Society had failed to disclose to a Detective
    Inspector Court of Protection Medical Certificates CP3’s. The Chief Constable directed the case to a Detective Chief Superintendent in December 2011.
    Only then did The Law Society release a copy of their investigating solicitors internal report dated the 30 September 2009

    “The Official Solicitor was acting as Mr. Lawrence’s representative and Guardian and as such had the greater duty to protect him. I consider that the
    majority of the steps that Mr. Lawrence feel should have been taken to protect him should have been taken by the Official the Official Solicitor rather than
    the firm including the decision and action necessary to invoke the Court of Protection”.

    8. In December 2012 the police assisted me to recover my medical files from Simpsom Millar LLP solicitors. Detective had questioned the standard of legal
    representation that I have recieved from this firm of solicitors based in Bristol, Leeds and London.

    9. Mr. Day of Counsel St Philips Chambers Birmingham written advice on Leonard Lawrence, funded by the Legal Services Commission Special Cases
    Unit: Mr. Lawrence had the protection of the Official Solicitor but was not registered as a protected party should be in the Court of Protection. Left
    financially vulnerable at both point of trial and order of sale. The FINAL ORDER OF DISTRICT JUDGE FORTGANG IS VOID as it has not been to the
    Court of Protection.

    10. Following the unhelpful and unpleasant telephone call to Mr Day by His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court, I have now in April
    2013 been invited by the Civil Court of Appeal to file an application, sadly St Philips Chambers Birmingham are unable to assist me. Why?

    11 Not surprisingly this week I am now being subject to further hassement from goverment sources, possibly arising out of the disclosure I recently made
    regarding the use of organophosphates in the Gulf War. May I suggest that our military be tested for chemical exposure prior to being given a diagnosis of
    PTSD. My medical files are available to assist them.

    Kindest Regards

    Leonard Lawrence

    Comment by Leonard Lawrence Pilot — April 17, 2013 @ 11:20 pm | Reply

    • Im glad to see that youve not given up, not that I thought you ever would..

      Comment by Eve — June 18, 2013 @ 12:38 pm | Reply

  4. The Abuse of Psychiatry in the Family Courts aided by Alistair Pitbaldo Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts and May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor.

    Lord Chief Justice, The Lord Chancellor and Admiral Sir John Brigstocke Royal Navy Rtd

    It is not understood why the report by Admiral Sir John Brigstocke KCB Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman on Leonard Lawrence did not inform the Lord Chief Justice and the Lord Chancellor of the following, detailed below, when following a request for help by Leonard Lawrence Richard Anelay QC Deputy High Court Family Judge took only a few days to establish that Leonard Lawrence had been a patient subject to Court of Protection.

    What is occurring

    1). Individuals are being certified in legal proceedings, like Leonard Lawrence, Lee Gilliland and Michelle Goldberg as lacking mental capacity to manage their property and affairs by unscrupulous General Practitioners and psychiatrists without medicals, following applications by solicitors or barristers to District Judges in County Courts.

    2). They are then placed by the County Court under the jurisdiction of the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts, presently Alistair Pitbaldo and the Deputy Official Solicitor May Maughan.

    3). Medical certificates of mental incapacity have no serial numbers and are ready obtainable, accordingly when issued they cannot be readily tracked. In the Leonard Lawrence case their existence was denied by Helen Clift from the Official Solicitors office to Slough County Court until after Leonard Lawrence signature was, on the instructions of Helen Clift, gained on public funding forms by Sarah Benfield Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors thus avoiding an application to the Court of Protection. Legal Aid was issued by the legal department, Legal Services Commission, knowing that Leonard Lawrence was a patient subject to the Court of Protection and was ineligible to public funding by more than Three Hundred Thousand Pounds.

    4). The Official Solicitor does not notify the protected parties’ status to the Department of Work and Pensions or to the Department of Health so no record appears on the patients National Insurance Number or National Health Service records. There is no requirement to notify the Land Registry of a persons protected status thus allowing the easy disposal of any property that a protected party may have an interest in. As demonstrated by Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk and BP Collins Solicitors.

    5). By not notifying the Office of the Public Guardian and the Court of Protection Alistair Pitbaldo Official Solicitor and May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor can then make the medical and financial decision substantially reducing the number of applications to the Court of Protection and achieving a expeditious turnaround of cases in the County Courts.

    6). His Honour Judge Simon Oliver in April 2012 considered the Court of Protection as simply a rubber stamping process who’s authority is routinely exercised by non-authorized District Judges. Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk having identified that Leonard Lawrence was a patient and subject to the Court of Protection expanded that financial decision is what the Official Solicior under takes, not the Court of Protection.

    7). HHJ Simon Oliver has available to him a transcript where Sarah Benfield Ratcliff Duce & Gammer Solicitors alerted District Judge Susanna Jones that she did not have jurisdiction over Leonard Lawrence and that it was necessary to invoke the authority of the Court of Protection. District Judge Jones disregarded this warning and continued to act. District Judge Jones subsequently wrote to the Circuit Judges at Reading County Court denying having conducted any hearings in the Leonard Lawrence case following her disqualification from the case. A search by Her Honour Judge Ann Campbell at Slough County Court established five court hearings District Judge Jones conducted after her disqualification from the case. Both HHJ Campbell and HHJ Elly subsequently made orders disqualifying District Judge Jones.

    8). His Honour Judge Simon Oliver stated in April 2012 that he did not know whether he had jurisdiction in the Leonard Lawrence case. The Court of Protection promptly identified that HHJ Simon Oliver does not hold a Court of Protection authority. The Official Solicitors files identifies that the appropriate orders were never sought from the Court of Protection.

    9). Simpson Millar LLP Solicitor had refused to disclose Leonard Lawrence medical files to the Court of Protection, defying the instructions of the Senior District Judge Principle Registry of the Family Division. An open email to David Harrington at Simpson Millar LLP in December 2012 copied to detectives from four police forces resulted in Simpson Millar LLP immediate disclosed of eight medical files on Leonard Lawrence including Court of Protection Medical Certificates CP3’s

    10). The power to remove Alistair Pitbaldo Official Solicitor and May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor from their office on account of misbehavior, or on account of inability to perform the duties of their office, may be excised by the Lord Chancellor Chris Grayling, with the concurrence of the Lord Chief Justice.

    Leonard Lawrence 2013

    Comment by Len Lawrence — March 25, 2013 @ 7:56 pm | Reply

  5. 14 JANUARY 2013 JOURNALIST GAGGED

    A journalist Jerome Taylor from the Independent was restricted from writing about a case on Monday 14 January 2013 and served documents an hour before the hearing. I notice he made the following statement on his twitter: ‘Nice. Just received a reporting restriction notice for Court of Protection case 1hr before court was due to sit. #stilllongwaytogo”.

    There were two known cases in the Queens Bench Division arising out of Court of Protection issues on Monday 14 January 2013

    1. The one that involved Mike Clarke (See Mike OPG website) was in the High Court in Manchester

    2. The one in the High Court, Queens Bench Division, London involving Leonard Lawrence, the Official Solicitor of the Senior Court Alistair Pitbaldo, May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor and the Court of Protection.

    The Law Society, Solicitors Regulatory Authority internal report having placed liability at the Official Solicitor for failing to protect Leonard Lawrence and Richard Anelay QC a Deputy High Court Family Judge and Head of Chambers 1 Kings Bench Walk having establised in September 2010 that Leonard Lawrence had been a patient subject to the Court of Protection Court in 2004/5/6.

    Records show that Barrister Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bech Walk had held a medical certicate issued to protect Leonard Lawrence but did not notify the Court of Protection and then proceeded to asset strip Leonard Lawrence assisted by BP Collins Solicitors Gerrards Cross Bucks and Helen Clift from within the Official Solicitors office who also failed to disclose medical certificates of mental incapacity to the court. (Google Leonard Lawrence Pilot organophosphate poisoning)

    It is known that May Maughan, Deputy Official Solicitor had been in contact with the Court of Protection prior to the hearing. There was a press release for this case, the press were present for Leonard Lawrence, but were stopped from attend the hearing. The hearing was before Master Yoxall in private.

    On the 14 January 1013 Master Yoxall identified that he was entirely satisfied that following the loss of all of Leonard Lawrence case files in May 2009
    in a house fire that also saw the complete destruction of the property, the Official Solicitor Alastair Pitbaldo and Deputy Official Solicitor May Maughan actions of denying Leonard Lawrence access to copies of his case files until he was out of time to bring a Civil Claim claim against the Official Solicitor to the Senior Court was entirely appropriate, even when these actions contravene the Fraud Act 2006.

    27th January 2013 — Sunday Express –Dead BA Pilots ‘Victims of Toxic Cabin Fumes’

    28th January 2013 — dailymail.co.uk –BA pilots die after complaining of long-term health effects of breathing in toxic oil fumes while flying

    28th January 2013 — mirror.co.uk –Two BA pilots ‘killed by toxic oil fumes’: Ill pair both complained of exposure to contaminated cockpit air

    Hospital Medical Director Report reference: Leonard Lawrence:

    1. He was then medicated to the extent that he lost mental capacity.

    2. During the period the Official Solicitor of the Supreme Court acted as his Guardian ad Litem, three Court of Protection medical certificates (CP3s) had
    been obtained but not registered with the Court of Protection.

    3. He was, therefore, for nearly 18 months regarded as a mentally ill patient without access to the Court of Protection. During this time considerable amounts
    of his assets went missing.

    Law Society Final Report on Leonard Lawrence complaint regarding B P Collins Solicitors, Gerrards Cross, Bucks.
    There is evidence to show that B P Collins Solicitors was aware of the existence of three CP3 certificates at the relevant time. There is further evidence including a letter dated 22 February 2005 that B P Collins Solicitors was aware that medical evidence relating to the customer’s state of mind had not been filed at Court. B P Collins Solicitors held a medical report dated 23 November 2004 confirming that the customer lacked the mental capacity to manage and administer his property and affairs. RDG Solicitors notified B P Collins Solicitors on 4 March 2005 of the need to refer to the Court of Protection when a party lacked capacity and that matters could not be concluded without the involvement of the Court of Protection.

    Comment by Leonard Lawrence — January 30, 2013 @ 10:50 pm | Reply

  6. The Right Honourable Lord Justice Munby President of the Family Division with effect from 11 January 2013 please be advised of the following:

    Ref: Hearing Royal Courts of Justice 14 January 2013,

    Leonard Lawrence accused by Alistair Pitbaldo Official Solicitor and May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor to the Senior Court of an abuse of the legal process following Richard Anelay QC Deputy High Court Judge Family Division establishing in September 2010 that Leonard Lawrence had been a patient subject to the Court of Protection and the Civil Court of Appeal in November 2012 enabling Leonard Lawrence to Appeal to a High Court FamilyJudge.

    1. On the 10 September 2012 Senior District Judge, Principle Registry Family Division directed that “The file, in the first instance, should be sent to the Court of Protection”. The case files were posted to the Court of Protection on 9 October 2012. Following a referral to the Court of Appeal Mr Lawrence is still awaiting a hearing before a High Court Family Judge. On the 13 December 2012 Simpson Millar LLP Solicitors have identified that they failed to make a full disclosure to the Court of Protection.

    2. May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor has advised that she will not make available to the Queens Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice for the hearing on the 14 January 2013 Leonard Lawrence case files held by the Official Solicitors Office.

    3. May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor also advised that she not make available to the Queens Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice for the hearing on the 14 January 2013 Court of Protection Medical Certificates CP3′s and other certificates of mental incapacity issued under Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983 that were not disclosed to the courts by Helen Clift a solicitor within the office of the Official Solicitor.

    4. May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor has advised that her office does not hold copies of the case files of the external legal representatives Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors Reading Berks that were appointed by the Official Solicitor. May Maughan personally sent part of Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors files to Simpson Millar LLP Bristol on the 20 March 2012 that included the disclosure of a note book from which pages had been cut out. The notes of the conference held at 29 Bedford Row Chambers prior to the Final Hearing that Mr Day of counsel had sought have still not been disclosed by the Official Solicitor to the Senior Court.

    5. Whilst May Maughan Deputy Official Official Solicior finds the assistance afforded to Mr Lawrence by the police amusing, a Chief Constables Office directed the case to a Detective Chief Superintendant this enabled Mr Lawrence to recover May Maughans correspondence to the Law Society and the Law Societies internal files. The Law Societies internal files directs liability at the Official Solicitor for failing to register Mr Lawrence with the Court of Protection. To be blunt the Solicitors Regulatory Authority (SRA) files identifies that SRA case worker Laura Markham and others within the SRA did not believe May Maughan the Deputy Official Solicitor submission neither did the SRA appointed investigating solicitor.

    6. Counsel written opinion supports the Law Society internal report and directs liability at the Official Solicitor for failing to register Mr Lawrence with the Court of Protection at the material time. In a video recorded with Barbara Hewson at Hardwicke Chambers, Ms Hewson accused the Official Solicitors office of several human rights violations against Mr Lawrence, this video was made available at the Cranfield Workshop in October 2011. Ms Hewson view was supported by other lawyers and expanded upon in the Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry ISSN 1512-0856.

    7. 20 March 2012 further disclosures by May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor of Leonard Lawrence case files when Alistair Pitbaldo Official Solicitor and May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor to the Senior Court was of the belief that Leonard Lawrence was out of time to take legal action against the Official Solicitor. The partial disclosure confirmed that Court of Protection Authority had been required on at least four occasions, identifying that the submission by Alistair Pitbaldo Official Solicitor to the Bar Standard Board could not be supported by the Official Solicitors case file.

    8. The former Official Solicitors Laurence Oades counsel Nicholas Allen 29 Bedford Row advised that he cannot support the submissions he made at court. Barrister Mr Allen has disclosed correspondence he sent to his opponent Barrister Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk on the 5 August 2005 stating that he simply accepted all that Mr Brazil requested of him not knowing what the consequences were. In September 2010 Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk informed Richard Anelay QC Head of Chambers 1 Kings Bench Walk that Mr Lawrence had been a patient subject to the Court of Protection and on the 16 April 2012 Barrister Dominic Brazil informed HHJ Simon Oliver Reading County Court monies should not have been released to Mr Lawrence without Court of Protection approval.

    9. A search of the Bar Standards Board (BSB) services providers computer back up system of deleted emails identified that Barrister Caroline Wilbourne 1 Garden Court Chambers has sought advice from the BSB what to do. Barrister Caroline Wilbourne is refusing to make any comment.

    10. Whilst searches by HHJ Campbell, HMCTS and others of the court safe’s at Slough and Reading County Court failed to locate missing court hearing tapes thanks to the Detective Chief Superintendant it can be shown that on 18 August 2005 Barrister Simon Calhaem 29 Bedford Row informed His Honour Judge Charles Elly that the former Official Solicitor Laurence Oades had not agreed the sale value of the property 38 Dukes Wood Avenue, Gerrards Cross, Bucks SL9 7JT. HHJ Elly stated that for the Official Solicitor to agree the sale value would in any event undermine many of the points of jurisdiction, HHJ Elly was not happy to leave the matter with barristers. Helen Clift and Miss Wilbourne 1 Garden Court did not return the case to HHJ Elly but were complacent that Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk furbished a false statement to District Judge Fortgang alleging that Laurence Oades the Official Soliciotor had agreed the sale value of the property 38 Dukes Wood Avenue, Gerrards Cross, Bucks.

    11. 16 April 2012 Mr. Day, St Philips Chambers advised HHJ Simon Oliver of the following: FINAL ORDER OF D.J. FORTGANG IS NOT VALID AS IT HAS NOT BEEN SENT TO THE COURT OF PROTECTION. Electronic records identify that Mr Day recieved what is discribed by Paul Hicks Simpson
    Millar LLP Solicitors as an angery phone call from HHJ Simon Oliver the next day.

    12. Disclosure by Simpson Millar LLP Solicitors on the 13 December 2012 show that Mrs. Motteram & Mrs. Ballard, Divisional Managers, Official Solicitors Office identified that The Official Solicitor was not authorized to make financial decisions on Mr. Lawrence’s behalf

    13. Lord Justice Ward [2009] EWCA Civil 1122 Marco Pierre White –and- Withers LLP 29th October 2009

    Comment by Lord Justice Ward

    63. The Family Division’s practice to admit all relevant evidence in the search for truth or to impose sanctions where there has been improper conduct.

    67. Furthermore, it must always be remembered that solicitors are officers of the court and if they are shown to have done wrong they should face the judgment of the court. It is not conducive to the administration of justice that such claims are simply swept under the carpet. It is in the public interest
    that the bounds of proper conduct be clarified.

    Leonard Lawrence

    Cc The Right Honourable Lord Justice Munby as President of the Family Division with effect from 11 January 2013.

    Comment by Leonard Lawrence — January 7, 2013 @ 11:39 pm | Reply

  7. Dear Lee,

    WARNING

    May Maughan, Deputy Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts,

    In October 2012 the Government has admitted more than 5,000 people were wrongly sectioned under the mental health act over the past ten years, including thousands of Britain’s most vulnerable patients having been locked up.

    How many were certified like Leonard Lawrence and Lee Gilliland without a medical and then asset stripped by solicitors and barristers like Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers, aided by Helen Clift a solicitor within the Offical Solicitors office and Stephen Piper a caseworker also within the Offical Solicitors office by the non disclosure to the Court of Protection of the patients protected status.

    It beggers belief that His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court, is entirley satisfied by this unlawful practice.

    According to Mr Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers on the 16 April 2012 Helen Clift was a former professional colleague of his prior to Helen Clift joining the Official Solicitors staff. By not registering patients with the Court of Protection no record would exist of the patient, thus leaving the patient open to exploitation.

    May Maughan, Deputy Official Solicitor to the Senior Court wrote to the Solicitors Regulatory Authority that there was no requirement for any application to the Court of Protection in the Leonard Lawrence.

    May Maughan comments were not accepted by The Law Society Solicitors Regulatory Authority caseworker Laura Markham or the Law Society appointed investigating solicitor. Even May Maughan own files does not support her submission to her professional body.

    The Law Society investigating Solicitor report disclosed in 2011 The Official Solicitor was acting as Mr. Lawrence’s representative and Guardian and as such had the greater duty to protect him. I consider that the majority of the steps that Mr. Lawrence feel should have been taken to protect him should have been taken by the Official Solicitor rather than the firm including the decision and action necessary to invoke the Court of Protection.

    Counsel advice on Leonard Lawrence, funded by the Legal Services Commission Special Cases Unit, Mr. Lawrence had the protection of the Official Solicitor but was not registered as a protected party should be in the Court of Protection. Left financially vulnerable at both point of trial and order of sale.

    Disclosure of Leonard Lawrence case file by May Maughan, Deputy Official Solicitor on the 20 March 2012 revealed many pages having been torn out. 20 December 2012 May Maughan refuse to discuss why these pages have been remove prior to her sending the files to Simpson Millar Solicitors.

    The remaining case files identified that during the period Leonard Lawrence had been under the jurisdiction of the Official Solicitor Helen Clift knew on at least four occasions when it was necessary to have involve the Court of Protection.

    16 April 2012 His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court
    Well, it actually says so in the Official Solicitor’s guide, does it not?
    It actually says in there, We have to refer this to the Court of Protection

    Take care Lee

    Leonard Lawrence

    Comment by David Bennett — December 21, 2012 @ 10:26 pm | Reply

  8. The Trauma Centre UK

    PROTECT VULNERABLE INDIVIDUALS

    Yet again with Mr Gilliland we have a tale of mistreatment as a result of neglect by those charged to uphold correct protocol and procedure. This account matches perfectly with all previous reports of failure to follow due process by bodies set up, in theory, to protect those who are temporarily or permanently made vulnerable by circumstance. Surely the UK Care systems and Judicial systems were set up to PROTECT VULNERABLE INDIVIDUALS not to incarcerate them and treat them as criminals. Even regimes in ex Soviet and Chinese countries, considered by many to be primitive, do not go as far as these acts which are being highlighted.

    If by investigations and the exposure of ‘cover ups’ individuals are found to have conspired together in these despicable and cowardly acts then each should be charged with the offences of fraud and professional misconduct in a public office. No matter what position in society they hold.

    More and more individuals I am introduced to and treat in my professional capacity are repeating the same experiences detailing atrocities at the hands of a system and some individuals within it, which defy belief and the comfort level for a supposedly civilised society. I thought after the last war these types of offences and individuals who carried out crimes against the vulnerable people were routinely investigated, traced and dealt with in accordance with the prevailing laws.

    Increasingly these cases provide evidence for a two-tier society, where those with the mental capacity to navigate the system receive one level of protection and those that cant are exploited and find the very system which was designed to protect them used by the unscrupulous to bend them to their will.

    It is bad enough the manner in which John Hoyte pilot and Leonard Lawrence pilot have been treated, this case involving Mr Gilliland reaches a comparable low. The video taken from CCTV footage and posted shows individuals smashing their way into Mr Gilliland’s home with the full physical support of smirking police officers. Mr Gilliland’s is a severely disabled person.

    It is time serious questions were raised in the House of Commons. I challenge MPs to come to the aid of their most vulnerable constituents and take the time to understand what is becoming the routine bullying and exploitation of vulnerable people apparently in the name of UK justice. After all the mark of a civilised society how it treats its vulnerable. It is within the public interest that vulnerable people are not routinely mistreated for the profit of a few.

    I would earnestly urge ALL genuine members of the Electorate to pursue their MPs to stop and prevent these atrocities from occurring again. So unjust and unpredictable are the circumstances which conspire to create the vulnerability of many of the victims that you can’t know that you won’t be next.

    Lastly! Am I angry at such acts No, I AM SEETHING WHICH IS WORSE THAN ANGRY because I see the emotional and mental damage these perpetrators inflict on individuals, and it is Clinicians like myself and the caring genuine colleagues who treat them and attempt to rebuild the broken lives of people who have been taught to fear the very system they should have the knowledge would protect them.

    I also question the broad stroke diagnosis of ‘lacking mental capacity’, not least because it allow external bodies a raft of incomprehensible powers over an individual life and assets but also because of the knowledge and experience, or lack their of, an individual appears to need in order to make this diagnosis.

    Let us all get this right and stop this limited number of individuals, often motivated by greed, continuing in the systematic destruction of real human lives.

    David Bennett

    Comment by David Bennett — December 14, 2012 @ 10:02 pm | Reply

  9. The Family Courts and the Official Solicitor Alaistair Pitbaldo and May Maughan The Deputy Official Solicitor

    Alaistair Pitbaldo The Official Solicitor and May Maughan The Deputy Official Solicitor is were the system fails. The Law Society and Ministry of Justice investigations and reports raises serious question into Alaistair Pitbaldo and May Maughan.

    Decisions including financial decisions are being taken by the Official Solicitors Office not the Court of Protection. HHJ Simon Oliver identifies the Court of Protection as a rubber stamping exercise. The Court of Protection responded within minutes of being advised of this advising that HHJ Simon Oliver was not an authorised Court of Protection Judge.

    The majority of Judges that I have encounted have been helpful, however there are sadly a small minority like HHJ Simon Oliver at Reading County Court that should consider their position.

    Thankfully there are many other Circuit Judges like HHJ Campbell, HHJ Elly and HHJ Hamilton see below:

    NOTE TO CIRCUIT JUDGE RE APPEAL OF MR. LAWRENCE 4/10/06 District Judge Jones Slough County Court:
    Mr. Lawrence was convinced that Mrs. Lawrence’s Counsel had shown me his without prejudice proposal on a previous occasion. Mrs. Lawrence’s Counsel said he had not. I certainly had no knowledge of this, but for the avoidance of any doubt disqualified myself from hearing the ancillary relief application. My next involvement was when RDG submitted their legal aid bill for assessment. (2006) I cannot find the ORDER I made disqualifying myself. If I said I disqualified myself from everything that would include the legal aid assessment. On 25 October 2006 HHJ Campbell conducts search of Slough County Court and identifies four hearings that DJ Jones conducted after DJ Jones made a ORDER disqualifying herself and Mr.Lawrence was certified under Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983 and was a patient subject to the Court of Protection. HHJ Campbell later disqualifies DJ Jones from any further involvement with Leonard Lawrence. The Court of Protection identify that DJ Jones has not and does not hold a Court of Protection nomination.

    .How the Mental Health Act is used in Family Courts to undermined the Court of Protection .

    a) Mr. Lawrence discovered that BP Collins Solicitors had been asked to hide assets from the court. Thereafter, BP Collins Solicitors and Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk were able to have Leonard Lawrence certified by Dr Royds, Cygnet Health Care, Godden Green, under Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983 without a medical. The Official Solicitors office was also able to have Leonard Lawrence certified by Dr Royds under Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983 without a medical.

    b) Helen Clift Official Solicitors office, BP Collins Solicitors and Mr. Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk, aided by Nicholas Allen 29 Bedford Row and Sarah Benfield Ratcliffe Duce and Gammer Solicitors by not disclosing to the Court of Protection the Court of Protection Medical Certificates CP3 were then able to generate substantial legal fees and asset strip Leonard Lawrence without the Court of Protections knowledge.

    c) This practice continues today, the case of Lee Gilliland Bristol also demonstrates this.

    d)No comfort can be gained when in can be shown that Mehrunnisa Lanai, Director of Inclusion, Solicitors Regulatory Authority had also failed to disclose to a senior police officer at Devon & Cornwall Police copies of the three Court of Protection Medical Certificates CP3 the Solicitors Regulatory Authority held and the findings of the SRA investigating solicitor Ms Anderson who directs liability at the Official Solicitor and barristers for Leonard Lawrence non registration with the Court of Protection.

    Google Leonard Lawrence Pilot

    http://www.ministryofjustice.info/leonard-lawrence-pilot-and-the-official-s...

    Leonard Lawrence Pilot

    Comment by Leonard Lawrence — December 4, 2012 @ 10:07 am | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The Rubric Theme Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 80 other followers

%d bloggers like this: