UKCORRUPTFAMILYCOURTS

June 4, 2012

Newborn babies taken by social services at birth

Filed under: Secret family courts — nojusticeforparents @ 9:32 pm

Newborn babies taken by social services at birth

S. Prichard made this Freedom of Information request to Staffordshire County Council

There was a delivery error or similar, which needs fixing by the WhatDoTheyKnow team.

 

From: S. Prichard

27 April 2012

Dear Staffordshire County Council,

Please can you tell me the statistics of the following under the
freedom of information act for statistics of the following going
back 5 year to date.

1. How many children were forcefully removed from their parents
when the child was 10 or above?

2. How many children were forcefully removed from their parents
when the child was aged between 5 – 9?

3. How many children were forcefully removed from their parents
when the child was aged between 3 – 4?

4. How many children were forcefully removed from their parents
when the child was aged between 1 – 2?

5. How many children were forcefully removed from their parents
when the child was newborn to 12 months?

6. If newborn, how long did the baby remain with the parents?

7. If newborn, was the child allowed to be breast fed by the
parent?

8. What are the statistics regarding health and development of
breast fed babies against formula fed babies?

9. Please supply statistics of children forcefully removed from
parents, that are now adults have gone on to do the following,
compared to children that remained with their parents

a) drugs
b) prostitution
c) failure at school
d) crime
e) prison / child detention centre or similar
e) Mental Health Problems
f) Their own children removed because they were adopted at birth

Yours faithfully,

S. Prichard

Link to this

 

From: S. Prichard

22 May 2012

Dear Staffordshire County Council,

Please can you acknowledge this request

Yours faithfully,

S. Prichard

Link to this

 

From: S. Prichard

28 May 2012

Dear Staffordshire County Council,

Please refer to internal review. Your council seem to have been
evasive with your FOI requests towards social services

I am appalled about the barbaric way your council act towards
fellow human beings.

I refer to two cases the below link shows that your LA employed
someone that was reported for child porn but you still allowed this
person to have access to children. It appears your council also
tried to cover this up.

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/so…

The second I am appalled at a blog I found of a baby being removed
at birth and this baby denied to even feed from its mother

http://staffordshiresocialservices.wordp…

Yours faithfully,

S. Prichard

Link to this

 

From: S. Prichard

28 May 2012

Dear Staffordshire County Council,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of
Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Staffordshire County
Council’s handling of my FOI request ‘Newborn babies taken by
social services at birth’.

[ FAILED TO ACKNOWLEDGE OR RESPOND ]

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is
available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ne…

Yours faithfully,

S. Prichard

Link to this

 

sandy Joyce left an annotation (28 May 2012)

Gosh, no acknowledgement to anything you wrote? That is awful 

I know of the case you linked to funnily enough, absolutely disgusting behaviour by the LA 

Have a read of this regarding foi 

http://www.ukauthority.com/NewsArticle/t…

Link to this

 

S. Prichard left an annotation (29 May 2012)

No answer – and looking at other requests they dont seem to answer any that have showed their barbaric methods. 

Lets hope that this foi raises awareness to this council’s underhand barbaric illegal tactics

Link to this

 

From: Allen, Gemma (L&D)
Staffordshire County Council

29 May 2012

Dear S Prichard

Re: Freedom of Information Act 2000

Thank you for your request for information. 

Staffordshire County Council does not ‘forcefully remove’ any children from their parents. 

Children who are removed against the agreement of parents would be subject to either police protection (removed by Police) or as a result of an Emergency Protection Order (EPO) or Interim Care Order (ICO) which are granted by the Court.

I note that you have requested an internal review. Please confirm if you would still like an internal review to go ahead. 

If you have any queries or require any further information please do not hesitate to contact me.

In the first instance if you have any comments relating to how your request has been handled by our authority, please write to Philip Jones, Head of Information Governance, Wedgwood Building, Block A, Tipping Street, Stafford, ST16 2DH. 

If you have any further comments relating to how your request has been handled by our authority, please contact the Information Commissioner, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 5AF.

Yours sincerely 
Gemma Allen
Access to Information Officer
Information Governance Unit
Staffordshire County Council
Staffordshire Place
c/o Wedgwood Building – Block A
Tipping Street, Stafford
ST16 2DH
Tel:             01785 278568      

[email address]

show quoted sections

Link to this

 

From: S. Prichard

29 May 2012

Dear Allen, Gemma (L&D),

I find it concerning that it was only after an internal review I
received a response from your council.

I will rephrase the questions changing the “forcibly removed”
phrase to an EPO or an ICO (please break down statistics)

I will expect a response within 20working days from today’s date to
stop an internal review

I would like to know how many parents whose children were subject
to an EPO or ICO complained that social services or social workers
facts were actually opinions with no evidence, they have mislead
professionals or courts, perverted the course of justice or abused
their powers as a social worker

Yours sincerely,

S. Prichard

Link to this

 

sandy Joyce left an annotation (29 May 2012)

The child was forcefully removed while the mother was still in the labour position, neither parent wanted their child taken and the social worker was in the labour room 

Court order or not, this was a classic snatch

Link to this

 

Vickie Clayton left an annotation (30 May 2012)

Watch out as they will pull the ‘cost above £450’ malarkey just offer to work for them for free and pay for your own crb check and sign a confidentiality firm. They can’t refuse any information then. Be cautious of the fools

Link to this

 

 left an annotation ( 4 June 2012)

HaHaHaha Your Havin a Laff Pmsl rofl 

http://Staffordshiresocialservices.wordp…

Advertisements

1 Comment »

  1. I just could not leave your web site prior to suggesting that I really loved the standard information an individual supply in your guests?
    Is gonna be back ceaselessly to inspect new posts

    Comment by legal help — June 24, 2012 @ 2:44 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: